The 70% response rate for truly chemo naive patients comes from another MDA article in the JCO. Here is the PubMed citation for th article, write if you want help locating the full text of it.
Chaya
Keating MJ, O’Brien S, Albitar M, Lerner S, Plunkett W, Giles F, Andreeff M, Cortes J, Faderl S, Thomas D, Koller C, Wierda W, Detry MA, Lynn A, Kantarjian H.
Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 428, Houston, TX 77030, USA. mkeating@mdanderson.org
PURPOSE: Fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC), which are active in treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), are synergistic with the monoclonal antibody rituximab in vitro in lymphoma cell lines. A chemoimmunotherapy program consisting of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) was developed with the goal of increasing the complete remission (CR) rate in previously untreated CLL patients to >/= 50%.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-arm study of FCR as initial therapy in 224 patients with progressive or advanced CLL. Flow cytometry was used to measure residual disease. Results and safety were compared with a previous regimen using FC.
RESULTS: The median age was 58 years; 75 patients (33%) had Rai stage III to IV disease. The CR rate was 70% (95% CI, 63% to 76%), the nodular partial remission rate was 10%, and the partial remission rate was 15%, for an overall response rate of 95% (95% CI, 92% to 98%). Two thirds of patients evaluated with flow cytometry had less than 1% CD5- and CD19-coexpressing cells in bone marrow after therapy. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia occurred during 52% of courses; major and minor infections were seen in 2.6% and 10% of courses, respectively. One third of the 224 patients had >/= one episode of infection, and 10% had a fever of unknown origin.
CONCLUSION: FCR produced a high CR rate in previously untreated CLL. Most patients had no detectable disease on flow cytometry at the end of therapy. Time to treatment failure analysis showed that 69% of patients were projected to be failure free at 4 years (95% CI, 57% to 81%).
PMID: 15767648
I had had little treatment before that mainly Rituximab and low doses Chlorambucil one treatment, I was actually surprised how little effect fluradabine had had on me having a good FISH test even I am unmutated.
As HDMP is the only thing I seem to respond, we will be doing that for the salvage therapy (HDMP and Campath) locally and then other chemo in London.
I am not looking forwards to the road ahead.
Chonette
My case sounds similar to Harvey’s that is why I am very interested in the journal.
I want to thank you for the imformation that you have been providing and I wish a complete remission for Harvey.
Sincerely,
Joan McEnery
]]>Before you can take Revlimid as a patient outside of clinical trials, you and your physician must enroll in the Revassist program. Having gone through it personally, Harvey’s impression is that it is a mechanism set up to avoid any possibility of fetal exposure to Revlimid. Given the historical experience with thalidomide use in pregnant women and the risk of birth defects, you can understand the caution for this thalidomide-related drug.
In reality, complying with the Revassist requirements is very simple. You have to swear you are not now pregnant, and you have no intentions of ever getting pregnant while you are taking Revlimid. If you are a guy, you have to promise you will not get anyone else pregnant during this period.
Celgene also has a Patient Support Coordinator to help with reimbursement issues: http://www.revlimid.com/hcp/hcp-psc.aspx.
They have a patient help program to mitigate the cost of the drug for patients whose insurance does not cover the cost of the drug. You will find contact information at the link provided.
Medicare programs seem to be different in different states, and in any case neither Harvey nor I are experts on this subject. If stem cell transplant and insurance coverage is an issue, we suggest you review the articles we published recently on http://www.clltopics.org on the subject of heavily subsidized (as in almost completely free of charge) transplant protocols at the NCI. Your tax dollars at work. I am amazed more patients don’t know about this terrific “deal”.
]]>